☀️ Energy Physics
📅 Березень 2026 ⏱ 14 min 🎓 Intermediate

Solar Panels: From Photon to Watt

Every standard silicon solar cell converts sunlight using a 1.1 eV bandgap p-n junction — a choice that is near-optimal for the solar spectrum. But fundamental thermodynamics sets an absolute efficiency ceiling of 33% for single-junction cells. Understanding why requires following a photon from the moment it enters the silicon to the moment it drives current.

1. The Solar Spectrum and AM1.5

The Sun emits as a blackbody at ~5778 K. The total power reaching Earth's upper atmosphere is the solar constant: S₀ = 1361 W/m².

After passing through 1.5 atmospheres of air (AM1.5 standard), the surface irradiance is ~1000 W/m², with significant absorption bands from O₂, O₃, H₂O, and CO₂. The spectrum spans UV (300 nm) through visible to near-infrared (~2500 nm).

Photon energy: E_ph = hf = hc/λ

UV (λ = 300 nm): E = 4.1 eV
Green (λ = 550 nm): E = 2.3 eV
Red (λ = 700 nm): E = 1.77 eV
NIR (λ = 1100 nm): E = 1.13 eV ← near Si bandgap
IR (λ = 2500 nm): E = 0.50 eV ← below Si bandgap

~52% of solar energy is in the infrared (λ > 700 nm)

2. Semiconductor Bandgap and Photon Absorption

A semiconductor has an energy gap E_g between the valence band (filled) and conduction band (empty). When a photon with energy E_ph > E_g is absorbed, it promotes an electron to the conduction band, leaving a hole in the valence band.

Silicon bandgap: E_g = 1.12 eV at 25°C (indirect gap). This means:

Beer-Lambert absorption:
I(x) = I₀ · exp(−αx)

α = absorption coefficient (depends strongly on λ and material)

Si at 600 nm: α ≈ 10⁴ cm⁻¹ → 90% absorbed in ~230 μm
Si at 900 nm: α ≈ 10² cm⁻¹ → 90% absorbed in ~23 mm (need light trapping!)

GaAs (direct gap, E_g = 1.42 eV):
At 850 nm: α ≈ 10⁵ cm⁻¹ → 90% absorbed in ~23 μm (far thinner)

3. The p-n Junction: Built-in Electric Field

A solar cell is a large-area p-n junction. The n-type layer (phosphorus-doped, electron-rich) sits on top of the p-type base (boron-doped, hole-rich). At the junction, electrons and holes diffuse across and recombine, leaving behind:

When light generates an electron-hole pair near the junction, the built-in field sweeps electrons toward n-side and holes toward p-side — creating a current without any external voltage.

Ideal diode (Shockley) equation:
I = I_L − I₀(exp(qV/nk_BT) − 1)

I_L = photogenerated current (∝ irradiance)
I₀ = dark saturation current (~10⁻¹⁰ A for Si)
n = ideality factor (1 for ideal, 1–2 real)
q = electron charge, k_B = Boltzmann, T = temperature

Open-circuit voltage (I = 0):
V_oc = (nk_BT/q) · ln(I_L/I₀ + 1)
≈ (0.026 V) · ln(I_L/I₀) at 300 K

4. I-V Curve, Fill Factor, and Efficiency

The I-V (current-voltage) curve of a solar cell under illumination sweeps from short-circuit current I_sc (at V=0) to open-circuit voltage V_oc (at I=0). Maximum power is extracted at the maximum power point (MPP).

Fill Factor: FF = P_max / (I_sc · V_oc)
= (I_mp · V_mp) / (I_sc · V_oc)

FF for good Si cell: 0.75–0.85

Conversion efficiency:
η = P_max / P_in = (I_sc · V_oc · FF) / (1000 W/m² · A_cell)

Commercial Si: η = 19–23%
Lab record Si: η = 29.4% (LONGi, 2023, HJT)
Multi-junction: η = 47.6% (under 665 suns concentration, III-V, 2022)
Temperature coefficient: Solar cell efficiency drops with temperature. For silicon: dη/dT ≈ −0.4%/°C relative. A panel at 70°C (typical rooftop) loses ~20% relative efficiency vs 25°C rating. This is why concentrator systems must cool their cells.

5. The Shockley-Queisser Limit (33%)

In 1961, Shockley and Queisser derived the fundamental efficiency limit for a single-junction solar cell under the AM1.5 spectrum: ~33%. This is not an engineering limit — it's thermodynamic, arising from three unavoidable losses:

−23%
Sub-bandgap photons — photons with E < E_g pass through unabsorbed (~23% of solar energy for Si 1.1 eV)
−33%
Thermalisation — photons with E >> E_g generate one electron-hole pair but excess energy E_ph − E_g lost as heat
−11%
Radiative recombination — detailed balance requires some photon re-emission (unavoidable); limits V_oc

Optimal single-junction bandgap:
E_g ≈ 1.1–1.4 eV (maximises the SQ limit area)

Si (1.12 eV) → SQ limit 33%
GaAs (1.42 eV) → SQ limit 33%
Ge (0.67 eV) → SQ limit 23% (too small: thermalisation wins)
GaN (3.4 eV) → SQ limit 15% (too large: sub-bandgap loss wins)

SQ efficiency: η_SQ = (∫_{E_g}^∞ N(E)dE · qV_oc_max · FF_ideal) / ∫₀^∞ E·N(E)dE

6. Why Real Cells Are Less Efficient

Commercial cells are well below the SQ limit due to additional loss mechanisms:

Loss Mechanism Typical Impact Mitigation
Reflection from front surface ~4% (bare Si) → ~1% (AR coated) SiN₄ anti-reflection coating, textured surface
Surface recombination High J₀ → lower V_oc Passivation layers (SiO₂, Al₂O₃, amorphous Si)
Bulk recombination Short minority carrier lifetime Float-zone Si (purer), passivated emitter rear cell (PERC)
Series resistance Lowers FF (0.85 → 0.75) Fine grid fingers, silver paste sintering, laser doping
Shunt resistance Low R_sh pulls down V_oc Manufacturing cleanliness, avoid edge shorts
Metal shadowing ~5% of front surface Fine-line printing, bifacial cells, transparent electrodes

7. Multi-Junction Cells: Breaking the Limit

Stack multiple p-n junctions with different bandgaps — each absorbs the part of the spectrum where it is most efficient. Subcells are connected in series; each absorbs progressively lower-energy photons.

Triple-junction example (InGaP/GaAs/Ge):
Top subcell: InGaP E_g = 1.85 eV → absorbs UV/blue
Middle subcell: GaAs E_g = 1.42 eV → absorbs visible
Bottom subcell: Ge E_g = 0.67 eV → absorbs NIR

Theoretical limit for N junctions under full concentration:
N=1: 40.7%, N=2: 55.0%, N=3: 63.8%
N→∞: 86.8% (Carnot-like limit for full-spectrum concentration)

Current records (NREL, 2026):
Si single-junction: 29.4% (HJT, LONGi)
2-junction (GaAs/Si): 35.9%
3-junction (III-V): 37.9% (1 sun), 47.6% (665× concentration)

Key challenges for multi-junction: lattice matching between layers (crystal defects at interfaces), current matching between subcells (series connection means limited by the lowest-current subcell), and cost of epitaxial III-V growth (~100× more expensive than Si per area).

Perovskites: ABX₃ compounds (e.g., MAPbI₃, E_g tunable 1.2–2.3 eV) are revolutionising multi-junction. A 2-terminal perovskite/Si tandem reached 33.9% (Helmholtz-Zentrum, 2023). Main challenge: stability under UV, moisture, and thermal cycling.

8. Economics: LCOE and the Cost Revolution

Levelised Cost of Energy (LCOE) = total lifetime costs / total lifetime energy produced. Solar LCOE has fallen ~90% per decade since 1980:

Year Module cost ($/Wp) LCOE utility solar
1980 ~$20/Wp
2000 ~$4.50/Wp ~$300/MWh
2010 ~$1.80/Wp ~$150/MWh
2020 ~$0.25/Wp ~$35/MWh
2025 ~$0.10/Wp $15–25/MWh (best sites)

Solar is now the cheapest source of electricity in history at good locations. The learning rate (Swanson's Law) is ~20% cost reduction per doubling of cumulative production — similar to Moore's Law but for manufacturing cost rather than transistor density.

LCOE (simplified):
LCOE = (C_capex · CRF + C_opex) / (CF · 8760 h/yr)

CRF = capital recovery factor = r(1+r)ⁿ / ((1+r)ⁿ − 1)
CF = capacity factor (fraction of time at rated power)
CF_solar ≈ 0.15–0.30 (location dependent)

Example: 1 GW plant, $0.50/W installed, 25yr, 7% discount rate, CF=0.22:
CRF = 0.086, LCOE ≈ $0.086 × 0.5B / (0.22 × 8760 × 1000 MWh)
≈ $22/MWh